Thursday, October 04, 2007

Mr Lock case

The court has remarked that this is a case where one uses a sledge hammer to crack up a nut.

For a difference of a few hundred dollars, the legal fee balloons into tens of thousands under the hand of 2 insured under the same insurer - NTUC Income.

Was it pride of the 2 drivers that is involved in?
Was it an oversight of the insurer staff at fault?
Why the goodwill offer comes so late after trashing one up in court?

Please, we are Asian, we are welcoming foreign talents.
But please do not bring in the bullshit logical from the West that everyone has their own rights and they deserve to be compensated for any inference of their rights.
Our brains is on our head, not our ass.

Same thing applies to the Judges.
Insurers are cash rich, so don't everything pay, pay, pay to the "victims".
So obvious that many foreign workers are maligning about their injury, yet you made the innocent party reward those "actors" for their few linings of "pain, pain,pain".

You tripped and fell due to your carelessness while walking in the pathway, you take responsibility of your own carelessness and dun accuse the pathway is uneven.

Do you see people tripping everyday on the same pathway?

No comments: